Distributed computing

 

Fundamental challenges and needs in a distributed system?

1. Coordination & Agreement: Multiple independent nodes need to work together, often towards a common goal, despite failures and asynchrony.
2. Data Consistency: Maintaining coherent data across multiple nodes, especially when data is replicated.
3. Fault Tolerance & Reliability: Systems must continue operating even when some components fail.
4. Communication & Message Passing: Nodes communicate by sending messages across a network, which is inherently unreliable.
5. Time & Ordering of Events: Global time is difficult to achieve, so understanding the order of events becomes crucial.
6. Resource Management & Load Balancing: Distributing tasks and resources effectively among nodes.
   
   

Algorithm types that address these challenges

•  Coordination/Agreement: Consensus is the absolute core here. What are the famous consensus algorithms? Paxos, Raft, Zab, PBFT, etc. Leader Election is also vital for many distributed systems to have a single point of coordination. Bully, Ring algorithms. Mutual Exclusion is about controlling access to shared resources – distributed locks/mutexes algorithms.

• Data Consistency: Distributed Transactions (2PC, 3PC) are designed for atomic operations across multiple nodes. Replication & Consistency Protocols (Quorum-based, Chain Replication, eventual consistency algorithms like Gossip) are about managing copies of data and ensuring they remain consistent to some degree.

• Fault Tolerance & Reliability: Failure Detection algorithms are needed to identify when nodes have failed. Heartbeats, Accrual Failure Detectors. Distributed Snapshots (Chandy-Lamport) are about taking consistent snapshots of the distributed system state for recovery or monitoring.

• Communication & Ordering: Message Ordering algorithms (FIFO, Causal, Total order multicast) ensure messages are delivered in a predictable order, even in asynchronous networks. Gossip protocols are efficient for disseminating information in a decentralized manner.

• Time & Ordering: Logical Clocks (Lamport Clocks, Vector Clocks) are crucial for ordering events in a distributed system without relying on global time. Physical Clock Synchronization (NTP, PTP, Cristian's algorithm) aims to synchronize physical clocks as closely as possible, though perfect synchronization is impossible.

• Resource Management & Load Balancing: Distributed Scheduling & Load Balancing algorithms are about distributing tasks across nodes to optimize performance and resource utilization. Consistent hashing is relevant here too for data partitioning.
  
  

Algorithms

Many algorithms form the bedrock of distributed systems, enabling them to function reliably, consistently, and efficiently despite the challenges of distribution (like network latency, partial failures, and lack of shared memory). Here's a breakdown of key algorithm categories and specific examples that are fundamental to distributed systems:

1. Consensus and Agreement Algorithms:

• Purpose: To achieve agreement among a group of distributed processes on a single decision, even in the presence of failures. This is crucial for ensuring consistency and coordination.
• Examples:
  • Paxos: A classic, complex consensus algorithm that is highly fault-tolerant and forms the basis for many other consensus protocols.
  • Raft: A more understandable and practical consensus algorithm designed for easier implementation and comprehension compared to Paxos. It's widely used in distributed storage systems and configuration management.
  • Zab (ZooKeeper Atomic Broadcast): Used in Apache ZooKeeper, it ensures consistent updates across replicated servers.
  • Practical Byzantine Fault Tolerance (PBFT): Handles Byzantine faults (arbitrary and malicious failures), important for systems in untrusted environments.
  • Multi-Paxos: An optimization of Paxos to improve performance for repeated decisions.

2. Distributed Mutual Exclusion and Leader Election Algorithms:

• Purpose: To control access to shared resources (mutual exclusion) and to choose a single process to coordinate actions (leader election) in a distributed environment.
• Examples:
  • Distributed Mutual Exclusion:
    • Token Ring Algorithm: Processes pass a token in a ring; only the process with the token can access the critical section.
    • Ricart-Agrawala Algorithm: Processes request permission to enter the critical section and defer to earlier requests or higher priorities.
    • Maekawa's Algorithm: Reduces the number of messages required for mutual exclusion by using quorum-based approach.
  • Leader Election:
    • Bully Algorithm: Processes hold elections when they detect a leader failure. The highest ID process wins and becomes the leader.
    • Ring Algorithm: Processes pass election messages in a ring to elect a leader based on process IDs.
    • Viewstamped Replication (VSR): Includes leader election as part of its replication protocol, often used in distributed databases.

3. Distributed Transactions and Data Replication Algorithms:

• Purpose: To maintain data consistency and availability across multiple nodes. Transactions ensure atomicity, consistency, isolation, and durability (ACID properties) in a distributed setting. Replication creates copies of data for fault tolerance and read performance.
• Examples:
  • Distributed Transactions:
    • Two-Phase Commit (2PC): A classic protocol to ensure atomic commitment of transactions across multiple databases. It has coordinators and participants.
    • Three-Phase Commit (3PC): An attempt to improve upon 2PC's blocking problem, but still complex.
    • Saga Pattern: A pattern for long-running transactions where atomicity is achieved through a series of local transactions with compensating transactions to rollback if needed.
    • Transactional Message Queues: Ensure messages are processed exactly once as part of a larger transaction.
  • Data Replication and Consistency:
    • Quorum-based Replication: Reads and writes require a quorum (majority or specific number) of replicas to participate, ensuring consistency.
    • Chain Replication: Updates are propagated in a chain of replicas for high throughput and strong consistency.
    • Consistent Hashing: Used for data partitioning and replication across nodes in a distributed hash table or cache.
    • Gossip Protocols: For eventual consistency replication, nodes periodically exchange information to propagate updates.

4. Fault Detection and Recovery Algorithms:

• Purpose: To detect failures in distributed systems and initiate recovery mechanisms to maintain system availability and correctness.
• Examples:
  • Failure Detection:
    • Heartbeat Protocol: Processes periodically send "heartbeat" messages to indicate they are alive. Absence of heartbeats indicates failure.
    • Accrual Failure Detectors: Provide a probabilistic measure of suspicion that a process has failed, rather than a binary "failed/alive" decision.
    • Ping/Probe-based Detection: Periodically sending ping requests to check if a process is reachable.
  • Recovery:
    • Checkpointing and Rollback Recovery: Periodically saving system state (checkpointing) and rolling back to a previous consistent state upon failure.
    • State Machine Replication: Replicating the state of a service across multiple servers and using consensus to ensure consistent updates, enabling automatic failover to a healthy replica.
    • Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) Recovery Mechanisms: Algorithms specifically designed to recover from Byzantine faults, often involving voting and redundancy.

5. Time and Ordering of Events Algorithms:

• Purpose: To manage time and order events in a distributed system where there is no global clock. Understanding the order of events is crucial for consistency and causality.
• Examples:
  • Logical Clocks:
    • Lamport Clocks: Assign logical timestamps to events to establish a partial order of events in the system based on the "happened-before" relation.
    • Vector Clocks: Provide a more complete causal ordering of events, capturing concurrent events and dependencies.
  • Physical Clock Synchronization:
    • Network Time Protocol (NTP): A widely used protocol to synchronize computer clocks over a network to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC).
    • Precision Time Protocol (PTP): Provides higher precision time synchronization, often used in real-time distributed systems.
    • Cristian's Algorithm: A probabilistic algorithm for synchronizing a client's clock with a time server.
  • Message Ordering:
    • FIFO (First-In, First-Out) Ordering: Messages from the same sender are delivered in the order they were sent.
    • Causal Ordering: Messages are delivered in an order that respects causality relationships (if event A caused event B, then A's message is delivered before B's message).
    • Total Ordering (Atomic Broadcast): All processes agree on the same delivery order for all messages.

6. Communication and Membership Algorithms:

• Purpose: To facilitate communication between distributed processes and manage group membership (knowing which processes are currently active and part of the system).
• Examples:
  • Communication:
    • Message Passing Interfaces (MPI): A standardized library for message passing, widely used in high-performance computing.
    • Remote Procedure Call (RPC): Allows a program on one computer to execute a procedure on another computer as if it were a local procedure call.
    • Publish-Subscribe (Pub-Sub) Systems: Enables asynchronous communication where publishers send messages to topics, and subscribers receive messages from topics they are interested in.
    • Message Queues (e.g., Kafka, RabbitMQ): Provide reliable asynchronous message delivery between processes.
  • Membership:
    • Gossip-based Membership Protocols: Processes periodically exchange membership information to maintain an eventually consistent view of the membership.
    • Centralized Membership Management: A central server manages membership, but can be a single point of failure.
    • Distributed Membership Management (e.g., using consensus): More robust but complex, uses consensus algorithms to agree on membership changes.

7. Distributed Monitoring and Debugging Algorithms:

• Purpose: To monitor the health and performance of a distributed system and provide tools for debugging issues.
• Examples:
  • Distributed Tracing (e.g., Zipkin, Jaeger): Tracks requests as they propagate through a distributed system, helping to identify performance bottlenecks and dependencies.
  • Log Aggregation and Analysis (e.g., ELK stack): Collects logs from all nodes into a central location for analysis and troubleshooting.
  • Distributed System Monitoring Tools (e.g., Prometheus, Grafana): Collect and visualize metrics from distributed systems to monitor performance and resource usage.
  • Distributed Debuggers: Tools that allow developers to step through code running on multiple nodes simultaneously.
  • Event Correlation and Anomaly Detection: Algorithms to automatically identify patterns and anomalies in system behavior for proactive issue detection.

Important Considerations:

• Complexity and Trade-offs: Distributed algorithms are often complex to design, implement, and verify. There are trade-offs between consistency, availability, performance, and fault tolerance. The CAP theorem is a fundamental concept that highlights these trade-offs.
• Implementation and Abstraction: Higher-level distributed systems and middleware often abstract away the complexity of these base algorithms, providing easier-to-use APIs and abstractions. However, understanding these underlying algorithms is crucial for designing and troubleshooting complex distributed systems.
• Context-Dependent Choice: The best algorithms for a particular distributed system depend heavily on the specific requirements of the application, the environment, and the desired trade-offs.

 Certification course in Distributed computing:

https://www.educative.io/path/become-a-distributed-systems-professional?utm_campaign=brand_educative&utm_source=google&utm_medium=ppc&utm_content=performance_max_india&eid=5082902844932096&utm_term=&utm_campaign=%5BNew%5D+Performance+Max&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=5451446008&hsa_cam=18931439518&hsa_grp=&hsa_ad=&hsa_src=x&hsa_tgt=&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQiA-5a9BhCBARIsACwMkJ5tSAMLX043_EH7hs1VuvZA4kciDmKrIcaNKpOKjUqFHUYAHxyRI6oaAuVtEALw_wcB